0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
On a 3 lane highway you'll find me sitting in the middle lane....
Quote from: rustynutz on August 10, 2011, 15:27:08On a 3 lane highway you'll find me sitting in the middle lane.... Why not pull over if lane 1 is empty?Do Police not bother to apply yhe highway code?
Any driver that wants to break the speed limit which I’m doing, can always use the outside lane
I quite like the emergency lane.For some reason I find there's usually not much traffic in there, except occasionally some inconsiderate individual who parks their car there with the bonnet up.
Quote from: db08 on August 11, 2011, 11:24:11I quite like the emergency lane.For some reason I find there's usually not much traffic in there, except occasionally some inconsiderate individual who parks their car there with the bonnet up. In UK the emergency lane will only be found on motorways and is called the "Hard Shoulder".No vehicle is allowed to "run" in that lane, unless an emergency vehicle going to an incident and the other lanes prevent passage.A vehicle is only allowed to stand in it if it breaksdown. There is a maximum time you are allowed to be there, I think 45 minutes, and if you have not been removed by your own recovery service then the Police will arrange recovery, at your expense.
I think it's more dangerous to keep swapping lanes all the time. I aim to drive at our speed limit of 70mph and normally manage this in the centre lane. If I kept on coming back into the inside lane where vehicles are doing 50-60mph, I would be in and out like a fiddlers elbow.
Quote from: StarSeeker on August 11, 2011, 10:46:23Any driver that wants to break the speed limit which I’m doing, can always use the outside lane If a car is coming up behind you in lane 2, and is itself about to be overtaken, would you pull over into lane 1 if lane 1 were clear?Interesting subject, this...
If it was clear in front of me, I would just get out of its way by pulling over into lane 1.
Quote from: StarSeeker on August 11, 2011, 12:17:28If it was clear in front of me, I would just get out of its way by pulling over into lane 1... which is where you should have been in the first place
Or, if they can't wait, they can always hop in the left lane and go around me....
Quote from: StarSeeker on August 11, 2011, 12:17:28If it was clear in front of me, I would just get out of its way by pulling over into lane 1... which is where you should have been in the first place Did I mention that lane hogging is a pet hate of mine
Quote from: rustynutz on August 11, 2011, 15:45:21Or, if they can't wait, they can always hop in the left lane and go around me.... A NO NO in UK and you will be done by the Police if they catch you doing this
Quote from: eye30 on August 11, 2011, 15:52:12Quote from: rustynutz on August 11, 2011, 15:45:21Or, if they can't wait, they can always hop in the left lane and go around me.... A NO NO in UK and you will be done by the Police if they catch you doing thisLegal in Oz....
Quote from: eye30 on August 11, 2011, 15:52:12Quote from: rustynutz on August 11, 2011, 15:45:21Or, if they can't wait, they can always hop in the left lane and go around me.... A NO NO in UK and you will be done by the Police if they catch you doing thisUNLESS - the traffic in lane 1 maintains a constant speed whilst a lane changer causes a hold-up in the middle lane, you are not then technically undertaking, simply maintaining flow with your lane...
So what is classed as lane hogging??If all three lanes are busy ...
So how is blame decided if say a vehicle in lane 2 moves into lane 1 and the vehicle in lane 1 hits the vehicle moving into 1?
Quote from: bumpkin on August 11, 2011, 16:01:42So what is classed as lane hogging??If all three lanes are busy ...If all 3 lanes are busy then it's not the scenario I painted. I would say a lane hogger was someone simply occupying an overtaking lane even though the lefthand lane(s) were clear with no little or no traffic ahead. Or, in other words, a lane hogger could be called a Star Seeker
Quote from: eye30 on August 11, 2011, 16:13:14So how is blame decided if say a vehicle in lane 2 moves into lane 1 and the vehicle in lane 1 hits the vehicle moving into 1?Would be a case of failing to give way when changing lanes....the driver from lane 2 would be at fault.
I guess the point though is that even if lane 1 is clear, a motorist in lane 2 sitting at 70mph is in my mind completely within his rights to be occupying lane 2 (despite it technically being an overtaking lane) on the assumption that sliproad traffic may cause excessive lane hopping.
Quote from: bumpkin on August 11, 2011, 16:30:49I guess the point though is that even if lane 1 is clear, a motorist in lane 2 sitting at 70mph is in my mind completely within his rights to be occupying lane 2 (despite it technically being an overtaking lane) on the assumption that sliproad traffic may cause excessive lane hopping.I disagree with this.They should move into lane 1 and then if the see traffic merging onto the road they can move over into 2.Don't forget, the traffic merging onto the road must giveway to traffic already on the road. They do not have a given right just to join without giving way to traffic already there.
The left hand lane is the one that you should be in most of the time. Although many people appear to hog the middle lane, it is the left hand one you should drive in most of the time.
So in summary, drive in the left hand lane apart from for overtaking, and once you've overtaken then move back into the left hand lane unless there are a stream of slower moving cars you need to pass in which case you should move back in to the left lane once you've passed them.
Motorists who hog lanes on motorways and dual carriageways in Devon and Cornwall could face a stiff fine in future.Police are planning patrols to crack down on such drivers.
The police say when they questioned motorists, lane hogging was one of things that bothered most drivers.Police will begin pursuing lane hogging motorists in earnest from the beginning of February.