Our return journey today from Holiday in Cornwall included the M5 motorway to the junction with the M42 - a distance of 140.1 miles. The motorway has distance boards at half kilometer intervals so I used this to measure the accuracy of the trip distance recorder in the car. The result was that the car trip recorder showed 140.1 (225.5 Km) miles over the measured distance whereas the actual distance covered as indicated by the motorway boards was 232.5 Km - a difference of 3.1%.
This means that my fuel consumption figures are 3.1% better than I previously thought, hence the car has averaged 49.1 mpg (5.7 l/100Km) in the 6165 miles (9921 Km) driven since new rather than my previous calculation of 47.82 mpg (5.9 l/100Km).
It's not every day that statistics come out in my favour.
(OK, OK - I know I'm an anorak for going into such detail)
Another interesting comparison is that on the trip down (282 miles - 454 Km) cruising on motorways/dual carriageways virtually all the way at 60 mph (97 km/H) the computer showed a fuel consumption of 53.6 mpg (5.3 l/100KM)
On the journey back (my wife was asleep

) I cruised at 70 to 80 mph (112-129 Km/H) and the computer showed a consumption of 51.6 mpg (5.5 l/100Km)
Despite this, I remain disappointed with the economy of my car after reading some of the results achieved by other members as reported here.